tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post2227815132726122210..comments2024-03-27T19:07:19.133-04:00Comments on The Silver Key: Cimmerian sighting: To read, or to re-readBrian Murphyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05563309422791320114noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-11550107345934651102009-05-12T01:24:00.000-04:002009-05-12T01:24:00.000-04:00Well, I suppose it's more of a book cabinet than a...Well, I suppose it's more of a book <I>cabinet</I> than a traditional shelf. I need it not only to protect my books from aging, but to protect them from my cats, who just love using books as impromptu scratching posts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-57952702324857014152009-05-11T21:28:00.000-04:002009-05-11T21:28:00.000-04:00Whoa... 66 books? And what's this about an opening...Whoa... 66 books? And what's this about an opening and closing bookshelf? I need one.Brian Murphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05563309422791320114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-19721604960499599282009-05-10T14:22:00.000-04:002009-05-10T14:22:00.000-04:00You think you've got it bad? My 'to-read' list con...You think you've got it bad? My 'to-read' list consists of 66 unread books at the moment, and it's growing all the time. Fortunately, my bookshelf opens and closes, so the dust gathering on those books is minimal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-78604411237824866482009-05-08T15:48:00.000-04:002009-05-08T15:48:00.000-04:00Thanks for the comments, all.
Terry: Yes, I do re...Thanks for the comments, all.<br /><br />Terry: Yes, I do remember that you recommended Sir Aglovale de Galis. I tell you what: I am going on a business trip to Las Vegas this week (and won't be posting here for probably 4-5 days). It's a long plane ride so I'll plan on reading that book, and will post a review after I get back.<br /><br />I have heard that Wolfe is a difficult read, but he's also been the subject of so much praise that I'd like to see what the hype is all about.Brian Murphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05563309422791320114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-6923989861344148752009-05-08T13:55:00.000-04:002009-05-08T13:55:00.000-04:00That's true about Gene Wolfe andy. I'm just not a ...That's true about Gene Wolfe andy. I'm just not a fan of the way that his stories seem to be deliberately set up as puzzles, and very elaborate ones at that, that often require you to intuit necessary bits of info as much from what *isn't* said or shown as from what is. It's just a heck of a lot of work reading his stories and I sometimes think the puzzle aspects of them are more important/effective than the actual story itself.Terry Lnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-3182763833420191202009-05-08T13:47:00.000-04:002009-05-08T13:47:00.000-04:00"Gene Wolfe is good...you should definitely try hi..."Gene Wolfe is good...you should definitely try him, but I found many of his works frustrating...they certainly demand re-reading, but not always in a good way."<br /><br />IIRC, Wolfe has stated outright that he deliberately tries to make his books require at least one but preferably a few re-reads to be understood.andynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-1588503092207008842009-05-08T09:13:00.000-04:002009-05-08T09:13:00.000-04:00I'm in the same boat as you: I have way more b...I'm in the same boat as you: I have way more books on my 'to-be-read' list than I'm comfortable with and I have recently been itching to re-read all sorts of my old favourites...not mention the books I haven't bought yet, but want to read! I think that the value of re-reading is definitely misunderstood in this day and age. As you mentioned most people seem to see books as one-time disposable entities that aren't worth looking at once used. I think this may be the case for books you didn't like obviously, but for those ones you do like re-reading is, I would say, a necessity. C. S. Lewis said something along the lines of "You haven't really read any book until you've read it several times." I certainly don't think that there is more value in reading a new book simply because you've never read it before...the levels of nuance gained, and just sheer enjoyment, of re-reading an old favourite is more than worth the effort.<br /><br />As to what you should tackle: well, since I recommended _The Life of Sir Aglovale de Galis_ I'd obviously place that one pretty high on the list. :)<br /><br />I'm looking forward to _Sigurd & Gudrun_ myself, but first I'll tackle the Rebsamen translation of _Beowulf_ I picked up recently.<br /><br />I used to love Guy Kay, but he has too many tics as a writer that bug me (most prominent being supposedly dark age characters that seem to act/think like moderns) so I haven't read anything by him since _Sailing to Sarantium_<br /><br />Gene Wolfe is good...you should definitely try him, but I found many of his works frustrating...they certainly demand re-reading, but not always in a good way.<br /><br />I'm sure this wasn't much help to your dilemma...sorry! :)Terry Lnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723077228948447528.post-22087293205990919202009-05-08T00:48:00.000-04:002009-05-08T00:48:00.000-04:00I'm there with you, Brian.
Well, not exactly. I g...I'm there with you, Brian.<br /><br />Well, not exactly. I guess I have my own pile of unread books. And my tendency to read six texts at a time tends to slow me down. But I'm always tempted to revisit my favorites. The re-read value is pretty high, too. I'm always finding new bits in there that I neglected the first five times around.Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17285645317925993821noreply@blogger.com