Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Top 10 reasons why I don’t care about Amazon’s The Rings of Power

The Rings of... Meh.
Perhaps you might be wondering, hey, when is that guy from The Silver Key going to weigh in on The Rings of Power? He loves Tolkien.

Consider this that post, but it’s probably not the droids you’re looking for.

I haven’t watched ROP, and at this moment have no plans to. I explain why in this handy top 10 listicle.

A caveat: If you like ROP that’s great! The point of this post is not to (overly) criticize the show, because I haven't seen it. That wouldn’t be honest, or fair. It's to explain my lack of interest. 

That said, apathy for a richly budgeted, dramatic interpretation of a beloved property must have some basis in negativity or critique. In my case, I saw each of The Lord of the Rings films in the theater on opening night, buying advance tickets and braving big crowds and sticky theater floors to watch Tolkien on the big screen. In contrast, I have Amazon Prime, could watch ROP at the click of a button from the safety of my living room… and have yet to expend even that amount of non-effort on the show. Why? My answers follow.

If you like or love the show and think I should give it a chance, please explain why. Who knows, you might win me over. But it will be an uphill battle.

1. The rights weren’t enough. No Silmarillion? No coherent storyline to hang an adaptation upon? Big problem. I knew the writers of ROP were facing monumental issues after learning that they only had rights to the Appendices of LOTR, not the 12-volume History of Middle-Earth nor The Silmarillion. There is no cohesive story to hang a dramatic series on, which means much artistic interpretation is required. That’s a recipe for failure. J.R.R. Tolkien was a genius, and trying to recreate what made him great from appendices and notes is a near-impossible task. The Jackson films were at their best when they hewed to Tolkien’s story and dialogue. In short, the limited deal struck by Amazon was like planting seeds into a thin, arid field, and expecting a rich crop. 

2. The Hobbit wrecked me. If I were to critique the loudest critics of this show it’s with this point: Your Peter Jackson veneration has a large blind spot. Remember these awful films? Like LOTR I also saw them in the theater. Not only did they suck, but I blame The Hobbit for creating the template that film adaptations of Tolkien must be LOUD AND EPIC AND IMPORTANT. The Hobbit (book) is rather small and cozy, save for The Battle of Five Armies and Laketown. The focus should have been on atmosphere and character, and instead it became a wholly unnecessary nine-hour epic. ROP seems to be a continuation of this fundamental misunderstanding of what makes Tolkien great. It’s not bombast and spectacle, it’s story and heart.

3. Dumping Tom Shippey soured me early. I wish we had a better recounting of what led to this foolish decision, but Shippey is the closest human being on earth we have to Tolkien, now that Tolkien’s son Christopher has passed. To cut the World’s Greatest Tolkien Scholar from the project seems to me a major misstep. He was an advisor on the Jackson LOTR films and played a part in their successful adaptation. Plus, he’s a genuine good dude (I spent more than an hour with him years ago at a convention in Boston, and he was very kind and generous with his time). 

4. The reviews haven’t been good. I read and watch reviews (and have written a fair number myself), and I have learned enough to know this show has some serious problems. Many disregard critics (“those who can’t, teach,” etc., and other such nonsense). I don’t. If it’s a source I trust, or if the reviewer is objective, thoughtful, and fair, these hold weight for me. I’m too old and my time is too limited to mindlessly consume entertainment without some indication that it’s worth my time, which leads me to point 5.

5. I only have so much time. I’m 49 years old and am acutely aware that I have only so much time on this planet. I’d prefer to spend that time providing for my family, spending time with family and friends, writing/creating, and reading. The ROP is apparently set to run five seasons, x 8 shows per season, and one hour per episode. That’s 40 hours minimum time investment. That’s a big commitment on something which apparently is not very good (see #4).

6. I’m not a big TV watcher. Give me a book any day. My current TV consumption is some evening news, and the occasional football game. My daughter got me into Stranger Things and I enjoyed that well enough. Beyond that, I don’t watch TV. My friends are still in shock when I tell them I haven’t seen Breaking Bad or The Wire or Better Call Saul or Ozarks, or whatever the hot property is at the moment. I'd rather do other things with my time than suck on the glass teat.

7. I like movies better. Movies have much more appeal than episodic, open-ended series that may or may not end well... if they end at all. Sure, movies can suck too but at least it’s only 2 hours wasted, as opposed to the folks who sat through seven seasons of Game of Thrones only to suffer through a dumpster fire final season. Or folks that invested time in prematurely cancelled shows. I did watch The Walking Dead and was sorely disappointed when that show began to rot from within, ambling along like a mildly hungry animated corpse. Maybe it’s the sword-and-sorcery fan in me, but give me the quick-hitting single film (S&S short story) over the multi-episode, multi-season TV series (phonebook epic fantasy equivalent).

8. I’m old and jaded. Hype bounces off me. I’ve seen enough, and done enough, and experienced enough heartbreak and disappointment, that trailers, regardless of how well-made, aren’t going to move me. I need to find the commitment from within. The irony is this is coming from a guy who works in marketing. 

9. It’s Amazon. I don’t particularly like this company, even though I admire its efficiency in delivering my packages on time. Doesn’t Amazon own enough of the world already? Do we want to live in a world where it also owns all art and product, in addition to the means of distribution?

10. I don’t want to see Tolkien adapted anymore. Yeah, it’s selfish, maybe petty. I don’t know. We’ve got the books, some cool old cartoons, the Jackson films. That’s more than enough. There are wonders beyond compare in The Hobbit, LOTR, The Silmarillion, HOME, The Children of Hurin, The Legend of Sigurd and Gudrun, his letters, etc., not to mention the hundreds of academic volumes examining his works. All of this should be enough. If the right director were to do the right adaptation, for example a Robert Eggers directed The Children of Hurin, I’d watch it. But even then, we don’t NEED it. We’ve got the books, and the books will always be better. You can’t out-do Tolkien’s unique brilliance, no matter how big your budget. Sorry Jeff Bezos.

12 comments:

  1. All valid reasons. I'd add another -- this series isn't for me/us. Honestly. I'm not into generational line-drawing but .. it's there. I'm a Tolkien fan but I was raised on the books. The Jackson LOTR was fantastic but it wasn't formative. For the generation who were kids when those movies hit, it's probably in their DNA now. New Star Wars, new Rings, pretty much 'new whatever' holds little appeal to me - in the movie space. (I'm kinda done with MCU, too, now that the first phase is done.)

    Like you, I'd rather read a book. So, that's strictly a personal affectation. Even after acquiring NETFLIX, I'm not watching much tv. I loved the first two seasons of STRANGER THINGS. I liked where it ended, and where the characters were at. For all the rave, I'm kind of hesitant to return and see them all dragged through the muck again.

    Someone just commented on their Fb page, wondering if they were being a 'bad' Star Wars fan for bailing out on ANDOR.

    My reply; Life’s too short. If it’s not working for you, it’s just entertainment and no one is obliged.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll forsake all the criticisms (of which I agree with many) and just say that I couldn't get through the first episode. The old-time, epic magic evaporated in front of my eyes. After turning it off, I said out loud, "I bet Tolkien is turning over in his grave", after which I heard it again from another critical viewer. A monumental waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. #7 is the one that always amuses me. We allegedly are living in a "Golden Age of Television," yet almost every series that enjoys significant popularity is a serialized story that never sticks the landing, leaving a massive crater of fans enraged that they invested so much viewing time and enthusiasm in something that ultimately didn't amount to much.

    I would have forgiven a lot about The Hobbit movies if they'd only nailed the Battle of Five Armies, but man did they ever fail at that. First they couldn't even figure out who the five armies were (WTF???), then they somehow ignored how cinematic the dwarves' last charge would have been in favor of moving everyone off the battlefield so they could create a mini-slasher film in the middle of their epic fantasy production and have our heroes go out as hapless victims of their super-orc villain. It was the movie-making equivalent of having an unguarded three-man fast break and then blowing the dunk at the end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I watched the first three episodes and I am done. The writing is lousy. The characters unappealing. There was spectacle and decent music but pretty images are not enough to get me spend another 6 hours with it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OMG we are kindred spirits! Thanks for writing this up, consider the post saved and shared.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paul: Great comment man. My lack of interest might indeed be also a generational gap. To quote Danny Glover, perhaps "I'm getting too old for this shit."

    Andy: Could not agree more about the charge of the dwarves and bodyguard of Bolg. I have blocked those movies out of my memory but was that awesome scene from the book left out? If so, FFS...

    Travis: You made it a lot further than I did. I have heard it delivers on spectacle and score, but the characters are flat and listless and there is almost no forward motion to the story. Sorry, the defense that they are "setting up events for season 2!" is laughable. That's an expensive/$200M setup that probably also cost you, oh, 10M viewers who gave up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have watched it and enjoyed it so far. It is lavish and fun. I have been amazed at the emotional reaction many people have had. It's a tv show. I like dwarves. I like orcs. You'd think Jeff Bezos dug up Tolkien's skull and jammed his dick into one of the eye sockets. Between Game of Thrones, the Witcher, the Wheel of Time, RoP, and (praise Crom!) the future Conan series, we are in a good place for fantasy tv. Anything is better than fucking Star Wars!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm glad you like it Michael! As (I hope) my post demonstrated, I have no hate for this, just an apathy. I might still watch one day. I hope we get that Conan series.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That Conan series was killed when they greenlit the Rings of Power. The showrunner that was developing it is running House if the Dragon.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've watched every episode. And I hate them. I hate them with the incandescent fire of a thousand burning suns. They're like the wreckest of wrecks . . . I simply cannot look away.

    That said, there are a few bright spots: the orcs are live prosthetics rather than the Hobbits' excruciating CGI. And . . . yep, that's it. The rest is a dumpster fire.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I thought I read that Conan had been picked up by Netflix. Could be wrong.

    Scott Oden, so...if I read between the lines a little, you're saying your like the show.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have given up on following the Conan TV saga... it seems all smoke and no fire. And, I don't have any faith in a faithful adaptation.

    Scott: Not sure whether to admire your tenacity or wonder if you also enjoy self-flagellation:)? Are you hoping it might get better?

    ReplyDelete