From the warm and pleasant climes of the civilized Mediterranean to the wastes of the frozen north, every civilization and culture had a strong belief in gods. Yes, there were atheists in ancient times--but very few. Only very recently in the long history of humankind have we abandoned the gods. Even today, I think most people possess an underlying spirituality—just less formal and codified, less ritualized. Human nature hasn’t changed much if it all over thousands of years—these stories prove it—and I don’t think our yearning and need for something beyond the material world will ever change. Christianity is a refinement; one benevolent god offers a safer narrative than many petty and vengeful ones. Though I’m not sure a better one. The existence of gods at war with one another, constantly interfering with mankind, might better explain the world we currently inhabit than the Christian.
The Greeks were big on STAYING THE FUCK IN YOUR LANE. There are things that are province of the gods, tread upon them to your peril. So many of the stories are about people pushing too far and being condemned to death or eternal torment. Pride cometh before the fall—and hard. Cross the gods? You’ll have your liver torn out by vultures. And that’s just the beginning. It will regrow and be torn out again. Rolling rocks uphill, only to have them roll back down again. And you’ll do this, forever. The underworld was real … but so were the Elysium fields. Scandinavia had Valhalla, and Hel. Teeth to enforce ethical behavior.
The Arthurian material rocked. I love the concept of chivalry—a code to govern behavior. Yes, these codes were violated (and quite frequently) by lawless knights, but there were standards to live up to. If we all did what’s right—and we know what’s right—there’d be no need for heavy-handed laws and stifling regulations, we’d have paradise on earth. Which is what Camelot was, for a time. Until Arthur’s betrayal by the affair of the all-to-human Lancelot and Guinevere, and it all came down.
The Charlemagne/medieval romances section was short and disappointingly “meh.” I enjoyed the historical introduction to Charles Martel and his battles against the invading Muslims and his massive win at Tours, but otherwise this section felt very rushed and tacked on. The “Horn of Roland” lacked the gravitas I had expected. The book is an abridgement and this section seemed the most abridged.
Rad quotes encountered while reading.
You will go most safely in the middle. -- Ovid
Yield thou not to adversity, but press on the more bravely. – Virgil
The descent to Avernus is easy; the gate of Pluto stands open night and day; but to retrace one’s steps and return to the upper air, that is the toil, that the difficulty. – Virgil
Multiple layers of meaning in 1 and 3, but that’s what makes myths so powerful and enduring.
Hey Brian, maybe you can help me out on this. I wanted to revisit Bulfinch's Mythology last year, but got so bogged down in which version to buy, I never purchased a copy. You motivated me to try again. So, which version are you reading? I've learned that there are some that have removed chapters (the one on the Aryans), others that have removed "racist" language, some that have updated the original language, etc. etc. What are your thoughts on the one you are reading? And to anyone else seeing this comment, what version do you own? I'd welcome any suggestions and comments.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Will
Hi Will, I've got an old 1959 paperback edition by Dell. It's an abridgment (though still 450-odd pages). I thought that the first book was strong (classical Greek/Roman/Scandinavian myths), book 2 was OK, a competent abridgment of the Arthurian myths. But the third felt incomplete and a disappointment. So I guess a mixed bag. I couldn't say if any language was bowdlerized--I figured it being from 1959 I was safe there.
ReplyDeleteI just grabbed a $1 Bargain used copy of SONG OF ROLAND (Penguin edition) I'd read an ebook version years ago (one of the first things I read on Kindle, I believe.)
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to a re-read soon.
The last time I re-read BEOWULF, the quotable material was leaping out at me.
Paul: I might need to go that route. And re-read Beowulf while I'm at it.
ReplyDelete