But since Pullman
is a big-time successful author, in the eyes of some we must take him seriously.
So I’m taking this opportunity on what would be Tolkien’s 121st
birthday to show just much how much he gets wrong.
"Wonder had gone away, and he had forgotten that all life is only a set of pictures in the brain, among which there is no difference betwixt those born of real things and those born of inward dreamings, and no cause to value the one above the other." --H.P. Lovecraft, The Silver Key
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Happy birthday to JRR Tolkien; jeers to Philip Pullman
Philip Pullman is another notable fantasy author who, alongside
the likes of Michael Moorcock and Richard Morgan, has grossly missed the mark
in his appraisal of The Lord of the Rings. Listening to this recent Geeks Guide to the Galaxy podcast
I was dumbfounded not only by Pullman’s ignorance of The Lord of the Rings, but the gall he exhibits throwing around
opinions on a work he admittedly read only once—and as a teenager. “I’ve tried
to read it since, but I was unsuccessful,” Pullman says in the interview (note: the
Tolkien portion starts around the 17:10 mark; its only a two minute segment or
so of the interview). Admitting this fact should automatically invalidate any
opinions you have on The Lord of the
Rings. I was forced to read Moby Dick
in high school. Had that been the only time I read it, and 40 years passed, how
much would my opinions on the book matter? None, right?
Sunday, December 16, 2012
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, a review
Warning: Spoilers
follow.
As I left an IMAX 3D showing of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey early Saturday evening, I
struggled at first to determine why I experienced such ambivalence about the
film. Then I hit on it: Director Peter Jackson has taken what is a
tightly-plotted, 300-page novel and turned it into the equivalent of a
multi-volume fantasy epic, with all the good and the bad that change entails.
My short review: The
Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey deserves the mixed ratings it has received
(65% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes as of
this writing). It was a qualified success, with some high points and some low
points. It’s good, but not as good as The
Lord of the Rings films, in my opinion. And in places it’s downright
annoying.
Friday, November 9, 2012
Just where is this guy?
Readers the world round are surely wondering what happened to that guy who writes The Silver Key blog? I wish I had something really cool to report, for example that I've been called in as an emergency consultant on The Hobbit, but alas, no. The answer to my lack of posting these days is: Life, covering high school football, and a side writing project. These things have consumed much of my limited free time and prevented me from posting to the blog. So rather than banging out half-hearted posts I've decided to take an extended break.
Am I burning with the news about Arnold Schwarzenegger reprising his role as Conan, or the muck Hollywood is making out of World War Z? You betcha. Have I been reading genre fiction worthy of critical review? Yes, that too. I just finished up the latest in Bernard Cornwell's ongoing Saxon Stories, Death of Kings, for instance. And a fair bit of swords and sorcery. I've been watching and enjoying The Walking Dead, too (alas, poor T-Dog, we hardly knew ye). I just don't have the time to write about these things with the blowhard attitude and half-baked analysis readers of this blog have come to appreciate and love.
I do plan on coming back and blogging again, but not now, and likely not anytime soon. So for now, a semi- apropos snatch of poetry from the great REH:
Am I burning with the news about Arnold Schwarzenegger reprising his role as Conan, or the muck Hollywood is making out of World War Z? You betcha. Have I been reading genre fiction worthy of critical review? Yes, that too. I just finished up the latest in Bernard Cornwell's ongoing Saxon Stories, Death of Kings, for instance. And a fair bit of swords and sorcery. I've been watching and enjoying The Walking Dead, too (alas, poor T-Dog, we hardly knew ye). I just don't have the time to write about these things with the blowhard attitude and half-baked analysis readers of this blog have come to appreciate and love.
I do plan on coming back and blogging again, but not now, and likely not anytime soon. So for now, a semi- apropos snatch of poetry from the great REH:
I could not bide in the feasting-hall
Where the great fires light the
rooms—
For the winds are walking the night for me
And I must follow where gaunt lands be,
Seeking, beyond some nameless sea,
The dooms beyond the dooms.
Friday, September 28, 2012
The Zombie Survival Guide, a review
The next time a Class 2 zombie outbreak occurs in my
neighborhood, I’ll be well-prepared to deal with the shambling corpses of
hungry undead now that I’ve read Max Brooks’ The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead.
The Zombie Survival
Guide dispels exaggerated myths and legends of the undead and instead
presents the reader with unvarnished “truths” about zombies. You’ll find
information on zombies’ physical strength, sight, hearing, and rate of decay,
and the pros and cons of various weaponry for battling the undead (everything
from medieval maces and claymores, to M-16s and flamethrowers). It describes
various scenarios for identifying early signs of localized (Class 1) outbreaks,
to full-blown widespread undead infestation (Class 3). You’ll find best
practices for battling zombies in urban settings, in harsh desert and swamp
environments, even under the sea. The Zombie Survival Guide tells you how to
defend your home by stocking up with key food and supplies, moving to your
second floor and destroying all staircases (recommended for Class 2), or how to
survive on the run as you move to the most remote and therefore safest parts of
the planet in a world-wide zombie apocalypse in which mankind is overrun (Class
4). The best vehicle should an outbreak occur? You might not guess it, but it’s
a bicycle. On a bike you can easily outrun the slow, slouching pace of zombies,
it will never run out of gas, you can carry a bicycle over rough terrain, and you
can maneuver a bike through the inevitable traffic jams that accompany a
full-on panic. Motorcycles are very good too, though their noise attracts the
undead. Boats are also a secure means of travel, says Brooks, but watch your
anchor line—zombies walking on the ocean floor can use it to climb up to your
boat. “Hundreds” of hapless victims have died this way, Brooks tells us.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Last Call by Tim Powers, a review
Scott Crane abandoned his career as a professional poker player twenty years ago and hasn’t returned to Las Vegas, or held a hand of cards, in ten years. But troubling nightmares about a strange poker game he once attended on a houseboat on Lake Mead are drawing him back to the magical city. For the mythic game he believed he won did not end that night in 1969—and the price of his winnings was his soul. Now, a pot far more strange and perilous than he ever could imagine depends on the turning of a card. Enchantingly dark and compellingly real, this World Fantasy Award–winning novel is a masterpiece of magic realism set in the gritty, dazzling underworld known as Las Vegas.
Tim Powers’ Last Call (1992 William Morrow and Co.; 2010 Blackstone Audio, Inc.) is studded with references to old myths, snatches of T.S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland,” the art of poker playing, and the unique culture and atmosphere of old and new Las Vegas. It contains numerous major and minor characters, overarching themes and subplots, and digressions into probability theory. In other words, it demands close reading and attention to detail. Listening to it in half-hour chunks as I did while driving to work was probably not the best idea, and may have affected my review of the book, but what follows is an honest appraisal.
Tim Powers’ Last Call (1992 William Morrow and Co.; 2010 Blackstone Audio, Inc.) is studded with references to old myths, snatches of T.S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland,” the art of poker playing, and the unique culture and atmosphere of old and new Las Vegas. It contains numerous major and minor characters, overarching themes and subplots, and digressions into probability theory. In other words, it demands close reading and attention to detail. Listening to it in half-hour chunks as I did while driving to work was probably not the best idea, and may have affected my review of the book, but what follows is an honest appraisal.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Plethora of Howard Days Panels on Youtube
If you didn’t make it out to Cross Plains Texas for Robert E. Howard Days this past June (I didn’t, and have not yet made the trip, though it is on my bucket list), despair not: You can experience the panels, vicariously, through the magic of Youtube. Videographer Ben Friberg filmed several of the panels and generously posted them for up for public consumption. They’re all incredibly interesting and fun, if you like this sort of thing. Here’s a quick list of links.
To read the rest of this post, visit The Black Gate website.
To read the rest of this post, visit The Black Gate website.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Some thoughts on the purpose of fantasy fiction
The author of another blog I discovered recently, Everything is Nice, recently chose to describe a quote by George R.R. Martin as representative of everything wrong with commercial fantasy fiction. I happen to like the quote quite a bit (you can find Martin reading it aloud in its entirety here), and asked why he felt that way.
Martin (who happens to be the author of the blog, not the actual George RR Martin) responded that:
It plays into the artificial and embarrassing Us versus Them divide that is sadly all too common within the genre community. Beyond the stupidity of jamming his thumb on the scales and simply assigning high status words to the thing Martin likes, however, is the amusing contradiction that those high status words have to come from reality. As Sam says, you certainly couldn't get a bloody steak in reality, could you? At the most basic level, if Martin can't write movingly or beautifully about the strip malls of Burbank (and I'm certainly prepared to believe he can't) then he has no business writing anything. He is basically saying he has no eye, no ear, no empathy. And that is why it is speaks to the problem of commercial fantasy in general.
To which I replied:
Martin (who happens to be the author of the blog, not the actual George RR Martin) responded that:
It plays into the artificial and embarrassing Us versus Them divide that is sadly all too common within the genre community. Beyond the stupidity of jamming his thumb on the scales and simply assigning high status words to the thing Martin likes, however, is the amusing contradiction that those high status words have to come from reality. As Sam says, you certainly couldn't get a bloody steak in reality, could you? At the most basic level, if Martin can't write movingly or beautifully about the strip malls of Burbank (and I'm certainly prepared to believe he can't) then he has no business writing anything. He is basically saying he has no eye, no ear, no empathy. And that is why it is speaks to the problem of commercial fantasy in general.
To which I replied:
I understand what you mean, Martin. Fantasy can certainly be
applicable to reality, as Tolkien once wrote. But I guess I would differ with
you that Martin’s quote represents everything wrong with commercial fantasy.
What if the “them” in your “us vs. them” comparison is our world, not some particular piece of it? Martin
is creating through his imagination another world that never was and never
could be, but I would argue that this exercise is nevertheless of worth as it
demonstrates our ability as humans to dream and to create. Imagination is
something we as humans do, and its fruits (even the otherworldly ones) are thus
part of the “real” human condition.
Do you think there is ever a place for other worlds, or must
all fiction, even heroic fantasy, engage with our own world? Much of reality
does suck, unfortunately; are we ever allowed even brief escape in the pages of
a book?
I think Martin’s quote highlights something fantasy can do
and strives to do, even if much of it is pedestrian and falls short in the
attempt.
Just as a sidenote, I think it’s rather ironic that Martin
of all fantasy writers would have chosen this quote, given that by far and away
his most popular creation, A Song of Ice and Fire, is quite grim and dark and
shares much more common with gritty historical reality (the bloody War of the
Roses) than fantasy.
I'm hoping that there will be more debate to come, but what do you think? What function does fantasy serve, if it isn't set in or applicable to our own world?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)