I was very pleasantly surprised to discover that one of the
podcasts in my regular listening rotation, Appendix N Book Club, recently
conducted an hour-plus long interview with Michael Moorcock.
Author of the Elric, Corum, and Hawkmoon stories, along with
many other fantasy and science fiction titles including Gloriana and the non-fiction fantasy genre treatise Wizardry and Wild Romance, Moorcock is
the only living author left on the famous Appendix N, a list of fantasy authors
cited by Gary Gygax as principal influences upon the Dungeons and Dragons role
playing game. Appendix N appears in the first edition Advanced Dungeons and
Dragons Dungeon Master’s Guide,
published in 1979.
Moorcock turns 80 years old on Dec. 18, and it was great to
hear him sounding very hale and hearty. He was buoyant, ebullient, and enjoying
the discussion.
I knew most of what was contained in the interview, but it made
for a wonderful listen. It covered a wide range of topics, including Moorcock
informally and casually allowing both Gygax/D&D and Chaosium to simultaneously
use his settings and characters for their role playing games, with disastrous
consequences (Chaosium threatened a lawsuit against D&D, and Moorcock was
never fairly compensated for his work); his (very) early days as a writer and
editor of an Edgar Rice Burroughs fanzine; a little about his exchanges with
Fritz Leiber in the pages of Amra, and Leiber’s subsequent coining of the term “sword-and-sorcery”;
his admiration of Robert E. Howard’s Conan stories and general antipathy for
Lovecraft’s works; the general lack of a viable fantasy market until the
publication of the unauthorized J.R.R. Tolkien Ace paperbacks by Donald A.
Wollheim; his dislike of The Lord of the
Rings, which he places in the category of children’s fantasy literature,
differentiating his own works as pulp-inspired; and his eclectic Elric
influences including the opium cigarette smoking Zenith the Albino (“Pretty
much Elric in a top hat and tails, really”). Moorcock reveals that of all his
characters, Elric remains the closest to his heart. He has returned to the character
again and again over his career, with death of the character no obstacle to penning
subsequent stories.
For someone who has dismissed genre fiction studies in the
past (of which my own, Flame and Crimson,
will soon be published—insert gratuitous tooting of own horn here), Moorcock
reveals himself to be highly aware of them, even sophisticated in their
application (see around 26:42, where he says of L. Sprague de Camp’s Viagens
Interplanetarias series, “I love those, because they were kind of
sword-and-sorcery, almost … or nearer to sword-and-planet than anything else”).
He’s also self-deprecating, stating that his cure for insomnia is reading his
own works. He discussed his early days of marathon writing, cranking out
Hawkmoon stories in three days, then using Roy Thomas comic adaptations to
refresh his memory when writing subsequent entries. He still loves fantasy and
science fiction, expressing his continued admiration for the likes of Leigh Brackett’s
Eric John Starks stories and Poul
Anderson’s The Broken Sword.
It was nice to hear Moorcock firmly establish his fantasy
works as belonging principally to the sword-and-sorcery genre. He confirmed
what I knew from an email exchange with John Jakes, that Lin Carter’s wonderful
Swordsmen and Sorcerer’s Guild of America (or SAGA) was far more myth than
reality. “He (Carter) wrote to us telling us that we’d joined,” he said,
calling it an excuse to have a drink together on occasion.
Newer to me was some of the biographical material covered, including
the social and political atmosphere of Britain in the 1950s/early 1960s. The
racism of the era fueled by migrations into Britain, post-Colonialism angst,
and the rise of feminism all impacted Moorcock’s fiction. There is some great
discussion on the general state of fantasy fiction today, which Moorcock
describes as largely moribund, and good conversation on the negative impact of
Dungeons and Dragons and the publishing industry on fantasy fiction. Wonder has
gone away with over- explanation and codification of magic systems and fantasy
races. Moorcock quotes Terry Pratchett, who described genre fiction as a big
pot from which subsequent writers should add at least one original ingredient
back into the stew, and not just take from others. Without that element the
result is derivative material and pastiche, Moorcock shrewdly points out.
I’ve had my issues with Moorcock, in
particular his oft-cited “Epic Pooh” essay (which I maintain is an
inaccurate, surface level critique of Tolkien, more of a splenic reaction than
actual criticism), but I have spent many, many enjoyable hours immersed in his
fiction, and it goes without saying that he’s a towering figure in fantasy and
science-fiction.
Kudos to Appendix N for scoring this interview. Nice job
gentlemen. If you haven’t added that podcast to your regular listening
rotation, I recommend you remedy that today. That and Rogues in the House and The
Cromcast are highly recommended for fans of pulp fantasy and sword-and-sorcery
in particular.
1 comment:
Yeah, I've always had mixed feelings about Moorcock largely (but not solely) because of Epic Pooh.
Post a Comment