Saturday, April 25, 2026

Returning to The Stand, and its comforts

I find Stephen King’s The Stand to be comfort food. I’m not sure what that says about me … but there it is.

A devastating plague accidently leaks from a top-secret U.S. Department of Defense biological weapons laboratory located under the California Mojave Desert. Extremely contagious and extraordinarily deadly, the plague, nicknamed Captain Trips (also Tube Neck and the choking sickness) suffocates its hosts in pleurisy and mucous, eliminating most of the world’s population.

There are survivors but many suffer far worse fates.

Unimaginable horror … but comforting to me, nonetheless. Perhaps because there is something of The Lord of the Rings in it, a novel to which I also return to again and again for familiarity and relief. King has stated on a few occasions that he was attempting with The Stand to write an American Lord of the Rings, and all the broad strokes are there: troupe of heroes banding together, an epic quest of good vs. evil that stretches from coast-to-coast in which Boulder serves as Minas Tirith and Vegas, Mordor. Maine is a sort of Rivendell. 

Randall Flagg, the Walking Dude, an American dark lord.

The second way in which I find The Stand comforting is its nostalgia. It takes me back to a different time and place in my life, enveloping me like a warm blanket. I think I read the original 1978 version sometime in the late 80s, when my King obsession was in full swing. I used to own this version, and was a fan of the depiction of Flagg’s cold and menacing eyes. I’m saddened to learn that at some point I parted ways with it.


When The Stand was re-released in 1991 for the first time complete and uncut, I bought the first edition Signet paperback, which I still own, and read it voraciously. Here it is.

My cherished, first edition paperback.


I graduated high school in ’91 and at the time my buddies and I were all mainlining thrash metal. Anthrax’s “Among the Living” (song and album) was the ultimate complement to this re-released uncut version of The Stand, which several of us read and chatted about. It was a glorious time. The period in which the events of the original novel is set--the late 70s--is the time of my early youth.

It's a vibe man, one I dig.

Like LOTR The Stand is about loss and the Fall. King says in Danse Macabre that he was inspired to write the book after America’s early 1970s backslide—the disgrace and resignation of Richard Nixon, the divisive and fruitless Vietnam War, inflation, and the 1970s energy crisis. “The America I had grown up in seemed to be crumbling beneath my feet,” King said. “It began to seem like an elaborate castle of sand and unfortunately built well below the high tide line.”

The Stand is absolutely fantastic in its depiction of rapid societal collapse. If we had any doubt how quickly our own bindings could come undone the events of 2020 made that clear. We disintegrated pretty damned quick. Rather than rally together the pandemic and its response drove a wedge in this country.

The Stand is entirely reframed post-COVID-19. It no longer feels so fantastic. Though we don’t know (and may never know) its ultimate origins, Covid probably escaped from a Wuhan Lab; perhaps an infected Chinese scientist escaped quarantine and went on the run with his family before the outbreak could be contained. 

Let’s hope we’ve seen the worst and will be better prepared next time. Maybe we should all read The Stand and remember what is at stake.


Postapocalyptic novels offer clarity and simplification. Office politics and tax rates and school budgets are wiped away, replaced by simple survival. With fewer choices, our minds are unburdened. We imagine how we’d do in that situation.

We hope good people would still come together in the end. 

King is in a very small handful of the most recognizable and read authors of our generation, and not without cause. Re-reading The Stand (I’m on page 272 of this 1,141 page monster) I’m reminded why. 

He’s a creative genius.

I haven’t read The Stand in perhaps 20 years and as I revisit it now I'm finding the number of small strokes of imaginative detail staggering. The cold-blooded Elder, an icy-eyed assassin in a hazmat suit who at the last hour will make sure Stu Redman doesn't survive to tell the tale. The wild-eyed Monster Shouter, a mad prophet who roams a barren New York landscape declaring that the monsters are returning. He's right.

King’s second authorial gift is bringing characters to life. The Stand introduces us to an broad and diverse cast, yet King renders each uniquely memorable. At this point in the book I’ve been reacquainted with the deaf-mute Nick Andros, laconic, blue-collar Stu Redman, troubled, budding rock star Larry Underwood, pregnant and free-spirited Frannie Goldsmith, petty crook Lloyd Henreid, and the creepy and nerdily awkward Harold Lauder. Each time it’s like meeting an old friend.

And then there’s Randall Flagg, the Dark Man, a half-man, half-demon, charismatic, mad, and full of evil design. 

King’s third gift is his ability scare the shit out of you. You don’t forget Underwood’s crawl for freedom through the Lincoln Tunnel in a terrifying, pitch-black sequence. Or the cool hand that slides out and around Stu’s ankle in the dark stairwell in his final escape from a Vermont CDC lab. Come down and eat chicken with me, beautiful…

Imagination, characterization, fear… The Stand combines all this with an epic storyline and so is one of King’s best. I’m not sure if it’s his best book—take your pick of IT, The Shining, Pet Sematary, 11/22/63, Salem’s Lot, Misery, a few others—but The Stand is in that conversation.


The Stand has been adapted for television twice, as recently as 2021, which I haven't seen, and apparently is not very good.

I watched the 1994 miniseries at college when it debuted and enjoyed it for the most part, though it still fell far short of the high bar set by the book. The opening sequence remains effective; I can no longer hear Blue Oyster Cult’s “Don’t Fear the Reaper” without thinking of dead scientists in lab coats slumped over lunch tables.

I’m sure I’ll share a few more thoughts as I finish, but it’s a long way to Vegas. Better get on my walking boots.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I never got into King, haven't read his books and have seen few of his movies. Also, I picked up your book and am about 1/2 way through it. It is very interesting and complete. Cheers.

Brian Murphy said...

Thanks man, glad you're enjoying Flame and Crimson!

Matthew said...

It's interesting that you find The Stand comforting. I haven't read it but King tends to be dark. This goes against a lot of assumptions that dark material traumatizes. Actual scientific data argues otherwise. Heavy metal fans are known for their psychological resilience for example. Which seems to prove to me that you need some sort of inoculation against dark subject matter. Which is why I roll my eyes when people talk about "cozy" fantasy.

Jason said...

I reread It and The Shining several times as "comfort" books. There is something comforting about returning to familiar characters and their (horrifying) stories. Plus, in King's longer works, you can get lost in the details of his world. One of the things Eco said in, "The Myth of Superman" was that people like formulaic stories because the repetition of plot elements offer a stability that the world itself doesn't. I can dig that (as someone who watches too many formulaic British murder mysteries). It took me a while to dive into The Stand because I didn't think a plague book would be as interesting as supernatural horrors (boy, was I epically wrong). I could see returning to it and experiencing the various beats again.

Brian Murphy said...

Great comment... I think there is something to horror as catharsis. If for nothing else it makes our own problems seem small in comparison.

Brian Murphy said...

I think The Stand rewards multiple readings... the world and the cast of characters are vast, and I see some characters in a different light now that I'm +/- 20 years older. I am not the same (constant) reader. Have not read the Eco book/essay, sounds like I should.

Jason said...

Yeah, I find myself wanting to return to some of my favorite King books--just to see what would resonate with me now, as an adult with most of his life behind him. Some things would hit differently I'm sure. (Also, thanks for a long-ago blog post about King's _Christine_! It pushed me to read the novel, and I thoroughly enjoyed it, even though it's one of the darkest King books I've read.)

Brian Murphy said...

You're welcome! I'm always grateful when anything I've written inspires someone to pick up a book. I enjoyed Christine quite a bit.

Andrew said...

This post is one of many references to King and The Stand, in particular, that I've come across lately (although maybe that just has something to do with my internet history being tracked by Big Tech). I have a complicated relationship with Stephen King. When I was a teenager and just transitioning from children's books to more adult books, King seemed the pinnacle of maturity and "grown up" books. I read several around that time, although oddly many of them were his lesser-known works. As I got older and more experienced, however, the opposite became true. King felt increasingly dumbed down and immature compared to most everything else I was reading. The folksy, idiosyncratic way his characters talk went from feeling cool to just annoying. I have, therefore, not read any King in a long time, and it has probably been around 20 years since I read The Stand now. I would like to read his Dark Tower books too (I stopped after book 4 several years ago), so maybe it's finally time to revisit him.

Brian Murphy said...

I feel like this is a common relationship to King. Early infatuation, sun sets as you move to more "serious" books and better authors, but then a return. That mirrors mine and sounds like you. I am enjoying The Stand very much (now past the 600 page mark, over halfway) and recommend the return journey. I myself haven't read the Dark Tower books, I read the first two and then got derailed and then came my long break from King. Maybe one day. I do believe he's a great writer for what he does--American blue collar horror, in a great universe of his own making which gives it a greater depth/breadth. People piss on his popularity but they also once pissed on Dickens for the same reasons. I dont' see King getting lost to time.